Archive for June, 2009

That’s So Green!

Monday, June 29th, 2009

I can’t take credit for this one, similarly to my gender neutral pronoun. Though this time, instead of the acclaim being my dad’s, it is my roommate’s, Sienna’s, and - despite its simple genius - I think it happened by accident.

It takes the form of a new expression.

We live in dangerous and changing times; dangerous for many reasons, and changing for just as dangerous reasons. One of these is my second biggest issue: Global Warming.

This summer, I’ve been living in LA, doing my own grocery shopping for the first time in my life, and it’s one of the greatest things that’s happened to me. Our first week living here, we walked down to the local Farmer’s Market and discovered we could buy almost all of our food their (with the exceptions of a few gluttonous indulgences such as tortilla chips and string cheese). Our lifestyle would only take 5.3 planets to support us! (I know it sounds bad, but you take the quiz…)

The point is, green has become a big part of our lifestyle. And it is a new fad. Indeed, hopefully it will be longer lasting than a fad.

Coming back to the simple genius new expression. “Green” is the new “cool”, so when you see something that’s cool, instead, you say “that’s so green!” Of course, you can’t call a Hummer “green” since they’re not even “cool”. (I really hate Hummers.)

You Have 1 New Post(s)

Saturday, June 20th, 2009

I don’t have a proposed solution for this, but it was on my mind, so I thought I’d share it.

Let’s say you log onto your e mail account, and in the corner is a notification box that says “You have (X) message(s).” But the only case in which it would be “message” vs. “messages” is with the number 1. Even for 0 and -1, you would say messages. Same with all the non-whole numbers between 0 and 1, and 1 and 2.

It just seems to me superfluous to go through the trouble of having the parantheses for one number out of an infinite amount. Again, there doesn’t seem to be a logical solution to this, not that it’s a pressing issue. I just thought it was weird. Why is zero plural? Why is negative one plural? Why is .8347239587 plural?

Scotty’s Missing Finger

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

This doesn’t really belong anywhere, except in the minds of everyone, so I thought I’d put it up here.

I’ve been watching an unreal amount of Star Trek - something we should all be doing to remind ourselves of our potential as a race - and this allows for me to play a little game with myself. The actor who plays Scotty, James Doohan (yes, the original Scotty, not the new one) got his right middle finger blown off (in laymen’s terms) during the invasion of Normandy, something he tried to hide from the cameras during his acting career. But there are a few episodes where you can spot that missing finger… as much as you can spot something that’s not there. And this shot was just too perfect to ignore:

Scotty's Missing Finger from the episode Catspaw, Season 2

Scotty's Missing Finger from the episode Catspaw, Season 2